APENDICITIS PEDIÁTRICA: ECOGRAFÍA, RESONANCIA MAGNÉTICA Y TOMOGRAFÍA COMPUTARIZADA EN ALGORITMOS DIAGNÓSTICOS ESCALONADOS

Autores/as

Palabras clave:

Apendicitis, Niño, Ultrasonografía, Tomografía Computarizada, Rayos X, Imagen por Resonancia Magnética, Algoritmos Clínicos

Resumen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46296/yc.v10i18.0899

Introducción: La apendicitis aguda pediátrica continúa siendo una causa frecuente de abdomen agudo quirúrgico, pero su diagnóstico se complica por presentaciones atípicas, variabilidad clínica y necesidad de limitar la radiación ionizante. Objetivo: revisar críticamente la evidencia sobre ecografía, resonancia magnética y tomografía computarizada en algoritmos diagnósticos escalonados para niños con sospecha de apendicitis. Metodología: se efectuó una búsqueda estructurada de guías clínicas, revisiones sistemáticas, metaanálisis y estudios de precisión diagnóstica publicados en bases biomédicas y fuentes institucionales, priorizando literatura pediátrica reciente y artículos con impacto en decisiones radiológicas y quirúrgicas. Resultados: la ecografía es la modalidad inicial preferida por ausencia de radiación, disponibilidad y rendimiento alto cuando el apéndice se visualiza; sin embargo, su naturaleza operador-dependiente y la frecuencia de estudios no diagnósticos obligan a integrar signos secundarios, probabilidad preprueba y reevaluación clínica. La resonancia magnética rápida, habitualmente sin contraste ni sedación, ofrece alta precisión como segunda línea después de ecografía equívoca en centros con disponibilidad. La tomografía computarizada mantiene excelente rendimiento y valor para complicaciones, diagnósticos alternativos y escenarios donde la resonancia no es viable, pero debe aplicarse con protocolos de baja dosis y justificación estricta. Conclusiones: el enfoque óptimo no es elegir una modalidad aislada, sino aplicar un algoritmo adaptativo que combine riesgo clínico, calidad de la ecografía, recursos locales y participación temprana de cirugía pediátrica.

Palabras claves: Apendicitis, Niño, Ultrasonografía, Tomografía Computarizada, Rayos X, Imagen por Resonancia Magnética, Algoritmos Clínicos.

Abstract

Introduction: Pediatric acute appendicitis remains a common cause of surgical acute abdomen, but diagnosis is challenging because of atypical presentations, clinical variability, and the need to minimize ionizing radiation. Objective: To critically review the evidence on ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography in staged diagnostic algorithms for children with suspected appendicitis. Methods: A structured search of clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and diagnostic accuracy studies was performed in biomedical databases and institutional sources, prioritizing recent pediatric literature and studies relevant to radiology and pediatric surgery decision-making. Results: Ultrasound is the preferred initial imaging modality because it avoids radiation, is broadly available, and performs well when the appendix is visualized; however, operator dependence and nondiagnostic examinations require integration of secondary signs, pretest probability, and clinical reassessment. Rapid magnetic resonance imaging, usually without contrast or sedation, provides high diagnostic accuracy as a second-line test after equivocal ultrasound in centers with adequate access. Computed tomography retains excellent accuracy and high value for complications, alternative diagnoses, and situations in which magnetic resonance imaging is not feasible, but it should be justified and performed with low-dose protocols. Conclusions: The optimal strategy is not a single modality but an adaptive algorithm combining clinical risk, ultrasound quality, local resources, and early pediatric surgical input.

Keywords: Appendicitis, Child, Ultrasonography, Tomography Computed, X-Ray, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Información del manuscrito:
Fecha de recepción:
11 de marzo de 2026.
Fecha de aceptación: 20 de mayo de 2026.
Fecha de publicación: 18 de junio de 2026.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Koberlein GC, Trout AT, Rigsby CK, Iyer RS, Alazraki AL, Anupindi SA, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Suspected Appendicitis-Child. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(5S):S252-S263.

Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:27.

Bonomo RA, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS, Rodvold KA, Goldstein EJC, Solomkin JS, et al. Diagnostic imaging of suspected acute appendicitis in adults, children, and pregnant people: 2024 clinical practice guideline update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2024;79(Suppl 3):S94-S110.

Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M, Beyene J, Schuh S, et al. US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology. 2006;241(1):83-94.

Zhang H, Liao M, Chen J, Zhu D, Byanju S. Ultrasound, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging - which is preferred for acute appendicitis in children? A meta-analysis. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(2):186-196.

Eng KA, Abadeh A, Ligocki C, Lee YK, Moineddin R, Adams-Webber T, et al. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, and MRI as second-line tests after initial US. Radiology. 2018;288(3):717-727.

Castro-Luna DI, Porras-Hernandez JD, Flores-Garcia JA, et al. Contemporary ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging for acute appendicitis diagnosis in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis. Research Square. 2025. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6100084/v1.

Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132(5):910-925.

Almaramhy HH. Acute appendicitis in young children less than 5 years: review article. Ital J Pediatr. 2017;43(1):15.

Marzuillo P, Germani C, Krauss BS, Barbi E. Appendicitis in children less than five years old: a challenge for the general practitioner. World J Clin Pediatr. 2015;4(2):19-24.

Choi JY, Ryoo E, Jo JH, Hann T, Kim SM. Risk factors of delayed diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children: for early detection of acute appendicitis. Korean J Pediatr. 2016;59(9):368-373.

Samuel M. Pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(6):877-881.

Kharbanda AB, Vazquez-Benitez G, Ballard DW, Vinson DR, Chettipally UK, Kene MV, et al. Development and validation of a novel pediatric appendicitis risk calculator. Pediatrics. 2018;141(4):e20172699.

Bundy DG, Byerley JS, Liles EA, Perrin EM, Katznelson J, Rice HE. Does this child have appendicitis? JAMA. 2007;298(4):438-451.

Andersson REB. Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2004;91(1):28-37.

Puylaert JBCM. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology. 1986;158(2):355-360.

Mittal MK, Dayan PS, Macias CG, Bachur RG, Bennett J, Dudley NC, et al. Performance of ultrasound in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children in a multicenter cohort. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(7):697-702.

Saucier A, Huang EY, Emeremni CA, Pershad J. Prospective evaluation of a clinical pathway for suspected appendicitis. Pediatrics. 2014;133(1):e88-e95.

Reddan T, Corness J, Harden F, Mengersen K. Improving the value of ultrasound in children with suspected appendicitis: a prospective study integrating secondary sonographic signs. Ultrasonography. 2019;38(1):67-75.

Zouari M, Issaoui A, Hbaieb M, Belhajmansour M, Meddeb S, Ben Dhaou M, et al. Predictive factors of acute appendicitis in children with non-visualized appendix on ultrasound: a prospective cohort study. Surg Infect. 2024;25(1):26-31.

Roberts K, Moore H, Raju M, Gent R, Piotto L, Taranath A, et al. Diagnostic ultrasound for acute appendicitis: the gold standard. J Pediatr Surg. 2024;59(2):235-239.

Darbyshire AR, Towers A, Harrison R, Taylor M, Carter NC, Toh S, et al. Routine ultrasound for suspected appendicitis in children: a single-centre retrospective cohort study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023;105(1):72-76.

Doniger SJ, Kornblith A. Point-of-care ultrasound integrated into a staged diagnostic algorithm for pediatric appendicitis. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018;34(2):109-115.

Benabbas R, Hanna M, Shah J, Sinert R. Diagnostic accuracy of history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and point-of-care ultrasound for pediatric acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(5):523-551.

Krishnamoorthi R, Ramarajan N, Wang NE, Newman B, Rubesova E, Mueller CM, et al. Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Radiology. 2011;259(1):231-239.

Aspelund G, Fingeret A, Gross E, Kessler D, Keung C, Thirumoorthi A, et al. Ultrasonography/MRI versus CT for diagnosing appendicitis. Pediatrics. 2014;133(4):586-593.

Dibble EH, Swenson DW, Cartagena C, Baird GL, Herliczek TW. Effectiveness of a staged US and unenhanced MR imaging algorithm in the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis. Radiology. 2018;286(3):1022-1029.

Martin JF, Mathison DJ, Mullan PC, Otero HJ. Secondary imaging for suspected appendicitis after equivocal ultrasound: time to disposition of MRI compared to CT. Emerg Radiol. 2018;25(2):161-168.

Schuh S, Man C, Marie E, Alhashmi GHA, Halevy D, Wales PW, et al. Properties of ultrasound-rapid MRI clinical diagnostic pathway in suspected pediatric appendicitis: a prospective cohort study. Am J Emerg Med. 2023;71:217-224.

Steinl G, Grabski D, Fleming M II, et al. Implementation of ultrasound and fast magnetic resonance imaging pathway reduces computed tomography utilization in children with suspected appendicitis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2023;39(1):238.

Dillman JR, Gadepalli S, Sroufe NS, Davenport MS, Smith EA, Chong ST, et al. Equivocal pediatric appendicitis: unenhanced MR imaging protocol for nonsedated children - a clinical effectiveness study. Radiology. 2016;279(1):216-225.

Petkovska I, Martin DR, Covington MF, Urbina S, Duke E, Daye ZJ, et al. Accuracy of unenhanced MR imaging in the detection of acute appendicitis: single-institution clinical performance review. Radiology. 2016;279(2):451-460.

Didier RA, Hopkins KL, Coakley FV, Krishnaswami S, Spiro DM, Foster BR. Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance imaging without contrast agents or sedation in pediatric appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(10):1312-1320.

Heye P, Saavedra JSM, Victoria T, Laje P. Accuracy of unenhanced, non-sedated MRI in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2020;55(2):253-256.

James K, Duffy P, Kavanagh RG, Carey BW, Power S, Ryan D, et al. Fast acquisition abdominal MRI study for the investigation of suspected acute appendicitis in paediatric patients. Insights Imaging. 2020;11(1):78.

Mushtaq R, Desoky SM, Morello F, Gilbertson-Dahdal D, Gopalakrishnan G, Leetch A, et al. First-line diagnostic evaluation with MRI of children suspected of having acute appendicitis. Radiology. 2019;291(1):170-177.

Lyons GR, Renjen P, Askin G, Giambrone AE, Beneck D, Kovanlikaya A. Diagnostic utility of intravenous contrast for MR imaging in pediatric appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(4):398-403.

Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):289-296.

Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380(9840):499-505.

Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, et al. Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ. 2013;346:f2360.

Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, Greenlee RT, Weinmann S, Solberg LI, et al. The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(8):700-707.

Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J, Butler PF, Callahan MJ, Coley BD, et al. The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(2):273-274.

Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY, Kim S, Lee YJ, Kim KP, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1596-1605.

The LOCAT Group. Low-dose CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adolescents and young adults (LOCAT): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(11):793-804.

Ko Y, Chang S, Lee JY, Kim J, Hwang JY, Lee KH. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 2-mSv CT versus conventional-dose CT in adolescents and young adults with suspected appendicitis: post hoc subgroup analysis of LOCAT data. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(10):5427-5435.

Park JH, Kim HY, Sim JY, Lee KH. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis: recommendations for CT imaging techniques and practical issues. Diagnostics. 2022;12(7):1585.

Serres SK, Cameron DB, Glass CC, Graham DA, Zurakowski D, Karki M, et al. Time to appendectomy and risk of complicated appendicitis and adverse outcomes in children. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(8):740-746.

Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MAW, Abis GSA, Acharya A, Ankersmit M, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis: EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(11):4668-4690.

Minneci PC, Hade EM, Lawrence AE, Sebastião YV, Saito JM, Mak GZ, et al. Association of nonoperative management using antibiotic therapy vs laparoscopic appendectomy with treatment success among children with uncomplicated appendicitis. JAMA. 2020;324(6):581-593.

Gil LA, et al. Appendicitis in children. Adv Pediatr. 2023;70(1):117-142.

Acker SN, Saito JM, McAteer JP, Washington ML, Diefenbach KA, Danielson PD, et al. Current practices and preferences for appendicitis imaging in children. J Surg Res. 2018;226:142-147.

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Suspected appendicitis clinical pathway - Emergency Department. Philadelphia: CHOP; 2024.

Halevy D, Wales PW, Doria AS, Schuh S. Imaging pathways for suspected pediatric appendicitis: balancing accuracy, time, and radiation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2023;39(9):650-658.

Tong L, Holland AJA, Nightingale S, et al. The utility of sonographic signs to diagnose simple and complicated appendicitis in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2023;39(1):247.

Hamid KA, Mohamed MA, Salih A. Acute appendicitis in young children: a persistent diagnostic challenge for clinicians. Cureus. 2018;10(3):e2347.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529-536.

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015;351:h5527.

Issaiy M, Pitea TC, Mostafa A, et al. Artificial intelligence and acute appendicitis: a systematic review. World J Emerg Surg. 2023;18(1):65.

Park NH, Oh HE, Park HJ, Park JY. Ultrasonography of normal and abnormal appendix in children. World J Radiol. 2011;3(4):85-91.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-06-18

Cómo citar

Mora-Meriño, D. D. C., Montt-Deavila, M. del C., Durango-Conde, O. L., Gonzalez-Niño, Y. R., Merlano-Bermudez, K. P., & Rodríguez-Muñoz, L. D. (2026). APENDICITIS PEDIÁTRICA: ECOGRAFÍA, RESONANCIA MAGNÉTICA Y TOMOGRAFÍA COMPUTARIZADA EN ALGORITMOS DIAGNÓSTICOS ESCALONADOS. REVISTA CIENTÍFICA MULTIDISCIPLINARIA ARBITRADA YACHASUN - ISSN: 2697-3456, 10(18), 1836–1866. Recuperado a partir de https://www.editorialibkn.com/index.php/Yachasun/article/view/972